New lead paint regulations likely this year
A commission studying the issue is expected to draft
legislation and send it to both houses of the General
Assembly.
Tuesday, April 26, 2005, BY PETER B. LORD, Journal Environment
Writer
PROVIDENCE
-- It is beginning to look like new lead paint regulations for
thousands of landlords will go into effect sometime this year,
but it also looks like they won't be the same rules that came
out of the state Health Department last year.
The
special legislative commission studying the new regulations
met yesterday at a round table with the intent of listening to
each other rather than the many witnesses who jammed recent
hearings.
The room
was lined with many of those same witnesses -- child advocates
who want to see the regulations left intact and landlords who
want them thrown away or weakened.
Commission
members once again were divided, with some siding with the
landlords and others with the advocates.
"I don't
think anything was clearly decided," Sen. Rhoda Perry,
D-Providence, said afterwards. She co-chaired the meeting with
Rep. Roger A. Picard, D-Woonsocket.
Nevertheless, she said the commission would draft new
legislation and send it to both houses of the legislature
during the current session.
Perry and
Picard said it did seem clear to them that the commission will
recommend going ahead and imposing regulations anywhere from
three to six months after the July 1 deadline now set by law.
The
commission agreed there is still much it needs to learn. It
wants to find out if most lead poisoning cases now are caused
by a relatively small number of landlords. It wants to know
where the poisonings are occurring and what the rules are in
Massachusetts.
One thing
the commission learned, to its surprise, was that penalties of
five years in jail and $5,000 fines for landlords who are
repeated violators were established in the state's original
1992 lead paint legislation. They were not new. And they were
rarely imposed.
The
commission plans to meet next on May 16 at 3 p.m. with
Attorney General Patrick C. Lynch and members of the state
auditor general's staff, who have been directed to determine
if the state now has the resources to enforce the new
regulations.
Imposition
of the regulations was already postponed from last year to
this year because the General Assembly didn't believe the
state had trained enough inspectors and provided enough
three-hour lead-awareness classes for landlords. Recently, the
House voted overwhelmingly to delay the regulations another
six months beyond the current July 1 start-up date.
Rep.
William San Bento, D-Pawtucket, and Sen. David E. Bates,
R-Barrington, both insurance agents, pushed for dramatically
scaling back the regulations.
San Bento
argued for exempting elderly landlords, owners of vacation
properties and houses in historic districts. He also called
for eliminating requirements for repairs to be done by
lead-certified contractors because he said they would charge
more.
The two
also argued for targeting neighborhoods where poisonings are
common and leaving other landlords alone.
Picard
questioned whether the elderly renting to families with small
children should be exempted.
Bates also
said the new regulations would be onerous to landlords in the
poorest neighborhoods because low-income people tend to move a
lot.
If you
require a landlord to get an inspection every three or four
months, that apartment is not going to be affordable," Bates
said. "You can't protect everybody from everything."
Afterward,
advocates complained that committee members are poorly
informed about the proposed regulations.
Roberta
Aaronson, director of the Childhood Lead Action Project, said
once a house gets a lead-safe certificate, that is good for 12
months, regardless of how many times tenants move.
She said
felony cases have rarely been brought, even against the worst
landlords responsible for poisoning many children.
And she
said there is a lot of confusion about the differences between
regulations in Massachusetts and those proposed in Rhode
Island.
She said CLAP would offer a lead-awareness class for
legislators today at the State House.
<<< BACK TO
LIST