R.I., DuPont reach deal on lead paint
The state continues to press its case against six other paint
companies.
Friday, July 1, 2005,
BY PETER B. LORD,
Journal
Environment Writer
PROVIDENCE
-- The DuPont Corporation has agreed to pay nearly $12 million
to settle its case in the state's lawsuit against companies
that made lead-based paints years ago that continue to poison
children.
Attorney
General Patrick C. Lynch said yesterday that he negotiated the
deal, in which the money will go to the Children's Health
Forum, a nonprofit agency based in Washington, D.C. that
focuses on preventing lead exposure. The group would then
channel the money for use in Rhode Island.
Lynch said
he plans to ensure that all the proceeds will go to local
efforts to clean up lead-paint hazards, to take enforcement
actions against landlords and to educate the public.
Lynch's
staff asked Superior Court Judge Michael A. Silverstein
yesterday morning to dismiss their case against DuPont.
Silverstein agreed to hear the request Wednesday. The state is
continuing to press its case against six other paint
companies.
Paint
companies have been sued by other communities around the
nation and have won every case. Rhode Island was the first
state to bring a lawsuit and is the first to win a settlement.
"Today is
an enormous victory for the people of Rhode Island," Lynch
said. "And it is historic nationally. The idea was to get the
people who made this mess help clean it up."
Both sides
took pains to avoid describing the agreement as a settlement.
In a news release, Lynch said "there is no settlement
agreement."
In its
release, DuPont referred to the $12-million deal as "an
understanding" and said the case has been "dismissed" by Lynch
when he recognized that the company was not an appropriate
defendant.
Stacey C.
Mobley, a DuPont senior vice president, said in a statement,
"We have reached a thoughtful and focused alternative to
litigation that addresses the concerns of the citizens of
Rhode Island and enhances public awareness of the issues
related to lead exposure.
"There is
no settlement agreement and DuPont will not make any payment
to the state or pay any fees or expenses," Mobley said.
But Motley
Rice LLC, the private law firm that is helping the state bring
its lawsuit against the paint companies, issued a statement
referring repeatedly to a settlement agreement.
Jack
McConnell, a senior partner at the firm, said Lynch wasn't
concerned with what the agreement was called, as long as he
got more resources to combat lead poisoning. So Lynch agreed
not to call it a settlement agreement too, McConnell said.
The trial
for six other corporations that made lead paint is scheduled
to begin the first week of September.
A
spokesman for four of those firms, Atlantic Richfield Co., the
Sherwin-Williams Co., Millennium, and NL Industries, issued a
terse statement yesterday:
"Questions
concerning DuPont's rationale are best directed to DuPont. We
believe that lawsuits against companies that long ago made
lead pigments used in paint are misdirected. Those property
owners who fail to maintain their properties should be held
accountable."
The
spokesman said no one would be available for further comment.
The other
defendants are American Cyanamid and SCM/Glidden.
Former
State Sen. Thomas Izzo, who wrote the lead-hazard legislation
that will affect landlords and tenants in Rhode Island, is an
adviser to the Children's Health Forum. The group had
previously contributed money for classes offered by the
Childhood Lead Action Project in Providence.
Lynch said
DuPont has agreed to donate $1.5 million for education and
training in Rhode Island, $1 million for community outreach,
$1.75 million for enforcement, and $6.6 million to abate lead
problems in 600 houses, all funneled through the Children's
Forum. He said it also will donate $1 million directly to
Brown University Medical School for lead-hazard research.
DuPont
also said it is contributing money to the Dana-Farber/ Brigham
and Women's Cancer Center in Boston, as part of the
settlement.
No money
is going to the government or to pay lawyers' fees, according
to both sides.
"My focus
was to bring money to the state to help solve these problems,"
Lynch said. "I personally negotiated this with the people at
DuPont. And I'll work with various groups to designate where
the money goes. I will see to it personally that it is all
used to solve problems in Rhode Island."
Details of
exactly how the money will be spent will be worked out later,
Lynch said.
Former
Attorney General Sheldon Whitehouse launched the lawsuit
against the paint companies in 1999, saying they should help
pay to clean up the lead paint that was poisoning so many
Rhode Island children.
The year
he filed the suit, 14 percent of the children tested in Rhode
Island had elevated lead levels. Last year, the number dropped
to below 4 percent.
The suit,
alleging the companies created a public nuisance, went to
trial in the fall of 2002. The state alleges that lead paint
remained on 270,000 to 360,000 houses in Rhode Island.
The
primary victims of lead poisoning are young children who get
lead paint dust or flakes on their hands and then put their
hands into their mouths. Tiny amounts of lead can cause
widespread neurological problems, particularly for young
children with developing brains.
For seven
weeks a six-person jury heard testimony from some of the
country's leading research scientists.
The suit
ended in a mistrial. Four jurors sided with the paint
companies and two voted for the state.
Lynch, who
was elected attorney general shortly after the mistrial, said
he was barraged with questions from financial analysts and
others about whether he would keep the case going.
"I
asserted on my first day in office that we would pursue this,"
Lynch said.
Since then
the state and Motley Rice have been working to retry the case.
The last
trial was to have been the first phase of a series of
hearings. This time, the state is consolidating its nuisance
case with evidence about liability that was to have been heard
in a separate phase.
McConnell's firm is scheduled to receive a contingency fee of
17 percent of the final award should it win at trial.
But
McConnell said yesterday the firm agreed to waive any claim of
the settlement reached by Lynch with DuPont.
"It was
that big a deal and that important," McConnell said. "This is
the first crack in their defense. It's big that DuPont broke
rank. They stepped forward and did the right thing. We hope
others will follow."
U.S. Sen.
Jack Reed called the settlement excellent news for Rhode
Island and the health of its citizens and praised Lynch for
his work on the case.
Olivia
Morgan of the Children's Health Forum said she was looking
forward to designing new programs for Rhode Island.
As new
regulations go into effect to prevent future poisonings, state
officials have acknowledged they have only two people to
enforce them and little money for public education programs.
"This
money is wonderful," said Morgan. "It's a vote of confidence."
<<< BACK TO
LIST