Rate hike request spurs complaints
At a public hearing, a lawyer for Narragansett Electric cites
rising fuel prices as the primary reason for the increase.
Friday,
August 19, 2005,
BY RICHARD SALIT,
Journal Staff Writer
NEWPORT
-- Narragansett Electric's plans to raise rates 12.4 percent
may be unstoppable, but that doesn't mean the utility can't do
more to help those who will be hit the hardest by the biggest
rate hike in seven years, a social activist testified last
night.
William F.
Flynn Jr., representing the antipoverty George Wiley Center,
sat at a Public Utilities Commission hearing and listened to a
variety of officials describe the proposed rate increase as
all but certain. The law, they said, essentially permits the
utility to pass on to its customers the higher prices it pays
to buy energy.
"We
understand the law," said Flynn, when he stepped up to address
commission members. But, he said, "We reject the notion
there's not a single thing you can do to protect the
low-income customers."
Flynn
urged the commission to require that the utility adopt the
same program of its sister company in New Hampshire, another
utility owned by National Grid. There, poor people in arrears
on their electricity bills are forgiven their debts one time.
Also, he
said, the commission can strive to ensure that the utility
does not employ overly aggressive tactics in going after
customers who are late making payments, typically people on
fixed incomes, including the elderly.
Under the
proposed rate hike, the typical customer -- one who uses 500
kilowatts of electricity -- would pay $70.58 a month, or $7.81
more than they do now, according to documents the company
filed with the commission last month. The rates could have
gone up Sept. 1, but that date has been indefinitely postponed
to allow the commission to continue holding public hearings
around the state .
Laura S.
Otton, a lawyer for the utility, echoed the reasons cited in
the filing for the increase.
"As you
know, we have been experiencing rapidly increasing fuel
prices. We have all seen this at the pump," she said. Under
the law, she said, "You cannot force Narragansett to lose
money on a product it is simply delivering."
The
company makes no profit from buying electricity on behalf of
its customers. Its profits come from distributing the
electricity.
Kathleen
O'Connell said that customers like herself, who elect to pay
12 percent more in their bills to support alternative energy
sources, shouldn't be hit with the same price hike.
David
Brown, another Newport customer, urged the commission "to give
some consideration to the little people . . . the people who
get behind in their bills . . . Not all of us are rich. We
don't all live in mansions."
Flynn
noted that in Newport, the ongoing redevelopment of public
housing at Tonomy Hill into a mixed-income development called
Newport Heights is requiring tenants to accept responsibility
for utility bills. Before, their subsidized rent covered these
costs.
<<< BACK TO
LIST